Virtual reality (VR) is a significant factor in the visualization of places and the replication of real-world environments within controlled laboratory settings. Virtual reality technology allows individuals to pre-experience decisions, creating visually and aurally pleasing environments. For this reason, different virtual environment concepts are frequently used in urban studies. Limited studies have investigated the ecological validity of soundscape studies in various virtual environments, but no comparison has been made between these environments with different audiovisual features. This study is aimed at understanding the difference between different virtual environments in soundscape studies. In this study, Immersive Virtual Reality (IVR) and Multi-Modal Measurement Laboratory (MMM) conditions are compared. In MMM, visual data is limited, and the interaction of the participants is less. However, it is more comfortable and easier to adapt than the IVR headset. In the context, locations within the urban area were determined, and the audio and video recordings were collected. The survey was conducted in accordance with ISO/TS 12913-2:2018, with additional consideration given to themes such as plausibility, and personal comfort. The survey was conducted in both areas. As a result of the study, the differences and similarities of soundscape studies applied in different virtual environments were evaluated.